The Social Responsibility of the Cameroonian Researcher in Management Sciences
Keywords:
Social responsibility of the researcher, Management sciences, Teacher-researcher - CameroonAbstract
This article aims to initiate a reflection on managerial CSR in the Cameroonian context. A concept still little known in Africa in general, CSR draws its sources from numerous works on CSR. A look at the state of research in Cameroon shows that the practice of responsible research is a real feat. An assessment of the apprehensions that teacher-researchers have about their SR is necessary to begin work on this theme. We are calling on different stakeholders to improve SG research in Cameroon. This improvement will undoubtedly pass better through a research model such as “Grounded theoryâ€, considered as a reference epistemological model for better production of managerial knowledge on African soil.
Downloads
References
2. André J.-C., (2013), “Researcher responsibility and research incentive mechanismsâ€, Environ Risk Health, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 68-76.
3. Argyris C. R., Putnam. McLain Smith D. (1985), Action Science, San Francico: Jossey-Bass.
4. Avenier M.-J. (2009). “Crossing a gap deemed insurmountable: building scientific knowledge relevant to practiceâ€, Management & Avenir, n° 30, p. 188-206.
5. Avenier M-J., (2004), “The development of actionable knowledge in SMEs legitimized in a conception of management sciences as artificial sciencesâ€, International Review of SMEs: economics and management of small and medium-sized enterprises, vol. 17, n°3-4, 2004, p.
6. 13-42.
7. Barthélemy J. (2012), “For management research reconciling rigor and relevanceâ€, Revue française de gestion, n° 228-229, p. 269-283. DOI: 10.3166/RFG. 228-229. 269-283.
8. Benjouad A. (2015), “The social responsibility of universities: experience of the international university of Rabatâ€, RSO International Meetings, 2nd edition.
9. Bergada à M. (2004), “Evolution of the economic and social episteme: proposal for a framework of morality, deontology, ethics and responsibility for the marketerâ€, Research and Application in Marketing, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 55-72.
10. Biwolé Fouda J. (2017), “From actionability to performativity of SG knowledge in the African context: some avenues for reflectionâ€, XXVIth International Conference on Strategic Management, 30p.
11. Bornmann, L. (2015). “Measuring impact in research evaluations: A thorough discussion of methods for, effects of, and problems with impact measurementsâ€. Higher Education, p.23.
12. Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). “How should the social impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons. Scientometrics, 98, 211-219.
13. Callon M. (2008), “Elaborating the Notion of Performativityâ€, Le Libellio d’AEGIS, 5 (1), p. 18-29.
14. Capron M. (2009), “Corporate social responsibilityâ€, In the Encyclopedia of Sustainable Development.
15. Coutellec L. (2018), “The social roles of researchers, myths and realitiesâ€, International Conference on Responsibility and irresponsibility of institutions, Paris.
16. David A and Hatchuel A., (2007), “From actionable knowledge to universal theories in management sciencesâ€, 16th International Conference on Strategic Management, AIMS, Montreal, June 6 – 9, 2007.
17. Demil, B., Lecocq X. and Warnier V. (2007), “The practice-research couple. Divorce, marriage or common-law union? », Revue Française de Gestion, 33(171): 31-48.
18. Demil, B., Lecocq X. and Warnier V. (2014), “What is useful research? », Chronicle on the profession of researcher, Revue International PME, vol. 27, n° 3-4, p. 7-13.
19. Dreveton B. (2009), “social responsibility and intervention research: What consequences for the researcher’s activity? AIMS Epistemological and Methodological Day, Caen.
20. Dreveton B. (2015), “The study of the social responsibility of the researcher-stakeholder: what methodological consequences? », International Management, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 83-94.
21. Gond J.-P., L. Cabantous. (2015), “Performativity: Towards a performative turn in organizational studiesâ€. The Routledge companion to philosophy in organizational studies. R. Mir, H. Willmott and M. Greenwood, Routledge: 508-516.
22. Henriot J. (1977), “Notes on the dates and meaning of the appearance of the word responsibilityâ€, Archives of Philosophy of Law, XXII, and p. 59-62.
23. Ioannidis, J.P. (2005), why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8).
24. Jonas H. (1990), the principle of responsibility. Translated from German by Jean Greisch, Paris: Cerf, 1990, 336 p.
25. Leduc M., (2015), “The responsibility of the scientific researcherâ€, In Archicube n° 19, Responsibility, integrity, ethics in research, Review of the Association of former students, students and friends of the Ecole Normale Supérieure.
26. Levy-Leblond J-M. (2018), “What can scientists be held responsible for? », International conference on Responsibility and irresponsibility of institutions, Paris.
27. Lyvian Y., (2013), “research in management science in West Africa: importation or adaptation? », the new dimensions of the performance of African companies, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso.
28. Mbock C G., Ngo-Mpeck, M-L., Kom, D. and Zambo Belinga J.-M. (2004), “Use of research results in public action in Cameroonâ€, International Review of Social Sciences 2004 /1 (No. 179), p. 43-51. DOI 10.3917/riss.179.0043.
29. Olenbe E., and Ombédé E., (2015), “Territories and knowledge of universities in Cameroon: discourse, objects, mediation. Economic and management sciences at the universities of Yaoundé II-SOA and Douala, The challenges of information and communication, n° 16, 3A.
30. Robitaille M., (2008), “What social responsibility for researchers? », Science and society.
31. Royer I., (2011), “The responsibility of management researchersâ€, Revue française de gestion, no. 216, p. 65-73.
32. Savall H., Zardet V. (2004), Research in management sciences: qualimetric approach. Observing the complex object, Economica.
33. Tioumagneng A. (2016), “Management sciences: what does research bring to the researcher himself? », FNEGE – The conversation France, General States of Management, Toulouse, May 26 and 27, 2016.
34. European Union, (2005), European Charter for Researchers
35. Von Roten F.C. and Moeschler O., (2010), “Relations between scientists and societyâ€, Presses Universitaires de France, Sociologie, vol 1, n° 1, p. 45-60.
36. World Bank, (2014), a decade of development in su-Saharan African science, technology, engineering and mathematics research, vol. 1, World Bank.
37. Verstraete T. (2007), “In search of Management Sciencesâ€, Revue Française de Gestion, N°178-179, p.91-105.
38. Perez R. (2008), “Is management research legitimateâ€, in Marchesnay M. and Payaud A.M. (coord.), Strategies and Powers Mixtures in honor of Professor Alain Charles Martinet, Viubert, p.52-62.
39. Demil B., Lecocq X. and Warnier V. (2014), “What is useful researchâ€, RIPME, Vol.27, n°3-4, p.6-13.
40. Savall H. (2012), “Research in Management Sciencesâ€, Revue Sciences de Gestion, Editorial, vol. 4, no. 91, p. 5-8.
41. Mesny A. and Mailhot C. (2010), “Collaboration between management researchers and practitioners: between pretenses and epistemic necessityâ€, Revue Française de Gestion, vol. 3, no. 202, p.33-45.
42. St-Pierre J. and Schmitt C. (2011), “Bringing together researchers and practitioners for the development of scientific knowledge: the example of research in SMEsâ€, Management and Avenir, vol. 3, no. 43, p. 392-409.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.