THE FILM ACTOR VERSUS THE THEATER ACTOR: CAZUL GAVRILESCU (THE GAVRILESCU CASE) AND PESCUIT SPORTIV (HOOKED)

Authors

  • Adrian Titieni National University of Theatre and Film, ’I.L. Caragiale’ Bucharest
  • Doina Rusti National University of Theatre and Film, ’I.L. Caragiale’ Bucharest The Research Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n5p%25p

Abstract

The article sets out from a number of studies of roles that unfold over a longer period of time, in order to analyse two concepts closely related to acting: dramatisation and authenticity. Drawing upon the semiotics of Greimas and Fontanille, our study establishes the pathemic journey of two characters – one from theatre, the other from cinema - in two works of differing artistic registers, but similar fields: Gavrilescu (The Gavrilescu Case, drama, 1996-1998 ) - and a movie character - Mihai (Hooked, movie, 2009). The conclusion is that in both situations acting demands identification with the character, as well as the construction of a simulacrum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

Downloads

Published

2014-02-28

How to Cite

Titieni, A., & Rusti, D. (2014). THE FILM ACTOR VERSUS THE THEATER ACTOR: CAZUL GAVRILESCU (THE GAVRILESCU CASE) AND PESCUIT SPORTIV (HOOKED). European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n5p%p

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2014): ESJ February Edition

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.