The Influence Of Orthodontic Treatment On Dental Pulp Response To Sensitivity Tests

Authors

  • Ramona Vlad Department of Odontology and Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tîrgu MureÈ™, Romania
  • Irinel Panainte Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tîrgu MureÈ™, Romania
  • Liana Hantoiu Department of Prosthetic, Dentistry Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tîrgu MureÈ™, Romania
  • Monica Monea Department of Odontology and Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tîrgu MureÈ™, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n6p322

Abstract

Aim of our study. To evaluate the difference between sensory detection threshold reactions of teeth under orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, determined by electrical and thermal pulp testing. Material and methods. After a selection based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 51 patients with a mean age of 19,3+/- 3,6 years old who presented to the Center for Integrated Dental Medicine of the Faculty of Dental Medicine from Târgu Mureș for orthodontic treatment had been included in this study. The reactions to thermal and electrical pulp testing were measured at baseline, after 8 weeks of treatment and during the contention period. Results. The application of orthodontic force immediately increased the response threshold which peaked after 8 weeks. Conclusions. Based on these results we conclude that dental specialists should interpret with caution the results of electric pulp testing in teeth under orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances as the cold tests with ethyl chloride are more reliable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

Downloads

Published

2016-02-29

How to Cite

Vlad, R., Panainte, I., Hantoiu, L., & Monea, M. (2016). The Influence Of Orthodontic Treatment On Dental Pulp Response To Sensitivity Tests. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(6), 322. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n6p322

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>