SYMBOLIC INFORMATION USE, MARKET SELECTION AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE; EVIDENCE FROM UGANDA COFFEE EXPORTERS

Authors

  • Aaron Ecel Department of a Marketing & International Business, Faculty of Marketing & Hospitality Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala Uganda
  • Godwin Ahimbisibwe Department of a Marketing & International Business, Faculty of Marketing & Hospitality Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala Uganda
  • Dennis Nuwagaba Department of a Marketing & International Business, Faculty of Marketing & Hospitality Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala Uganda
  • Ronett Atukunda Department of a Marketing & International Business, Faculty of Marketing & Hospitality Management, Makerere University Business School, Kampala Uganda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n10p%25p

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish the predictive potential of symbolic information use on the selection of export markets and export performance. Inspiration for the study was derived from the fact that one of Uganda’s top export earners (coffee) is concentrated in few export markets, in which its contribution is marginal (insignificant). Results from a cross-sectional and quantitative study of coffee exporting firms in Uganda revealed that, the symbolic use of information and the selected export markets had the predictive potential of 50 percent of the export performance of these firms. There was a negative and significant relationship between the symbolic use of export information and the selection of export markets as well as a negative and significant relationship between the symbolic use of export information and the export performance of these firms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Statistics

Downloads

Published

2013-04-30

How to Cite

Ecel, A., Ahimbisibwe, G., Nuwagaba, D., & Atukunda, R. (2013). SYMBOLIC INFORMATION USE, MARKET SELECTION AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE; EVIDENCE FROM UGANDA COFFEE EXPORTERS. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n10p%p